Menu

Home

Ed Fringe '16

Private Eye

Tour Dates

Books

Staying Alive

Staying Alive Tips

Videos

Biography

Contact

Press Info

Interview Feature

Press Quotes

Tour Reviews

Merchandise

Photos

Log in

February 21, 2015

Private Eye Issue 1385
Filed under: Private Eye — Dr. Phil @ 6:16 pm

With friends like the BMA….

“The freedom to raise concerns without fear of reprisal is vitally important for patient safety.” So trumpets the British Medical Association in response to Sir Robert Francis’s Freedom to Speak Up Review. So why is the BMA suing whistleblowing surgeon Ed Jesudason for legal costs of up to £250,000 resulting from the collapse of a High Court battle? If successful, it will bankrupt him. Jesudason’s ‘crime’ was to refuse to sign a compromise agreement brokered by the BMA’s appointed solicitors that demanded he destroy documents including letters which exposed false claims that another whistleblowing surgeon at Alder Hey, Shiban Ahmed, was suicidal. The documents also exposed how poor the representation of Mr Ahmed was by the BMA. Instead of taking the gag, Jesudason shared this evidence with the Care Quality Commission, Mr Ahmed and the campaign group Patients First, of which MD is a patron. MD was so appalled by the treatment of Jesudason and Ahmed, and the failure to thoroughly investigate their patient safety concerns,that he wrote about it repeatedly in the Eye.

Jesudason also made protected disclosures about the surgery department at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital Foundation Trust in 2009, and says the BMA acted against his wishes to settle the case in 2012. When the BMA realised he was sharing information with third parties, they pulled out of the case which caused it to collapse. On the eve of collapse – December 16, 2012 – MD was contacted by Janine Allen, a partner at Gately LLP (appointed by the BMA to represent Jesudason) and ordered to ‘permanently destroy as a matter of urgency’ all email communications between myself and Jesudason. On December 17, I received a demand from the same Janine Allen to ‘forward to us as a matter of urgency’ all email communications between myself and Jesudason.

Jesudason is now expected to pay £250,000 for this confusing and contradictory representation. As he told the Health Service Journal: “The trust offered me a six figure sum to go quietly which I refused. I just wanted matters investigated. Days before we sought to make the injunction permanent and against my express wishes, my BMA lawyers tried to get an even bigger pay-off in return for destruction of the concealed evidence about Mr Ahmed. I have not slept under a roof of my own since 2012, and if the BMA win it would render me insolvent.”

The BMA knows better than anyone how badly whistleblowing doctors are treated, as it generally represents them at tribunals. It has a huge data base of cases and compromise agreements that it presumably submitted to the Francis Inquiry. And yet the BMA does not get a single mention in the Freedom to Speak Up Review. A whistle-blower would naturally turn to his or her union for independent help, support and advocacy and yet in MD’s experience, more often the union will seek to suppress the concerns with a gagging clause and a pay-off rather than risk the wrath of, say, a large hospital that employs many more of its members. Often it is doctors who bully other doctors in whistleblowing cases, and all are ‘represented’ by the same union.

Jesudason received a standing ovation at the BMA’s annual representative meeting in June 2014, and the meeting then called on health secretary Jeremy Hunt to hold a public inquiry into whistleblowing and to explore how the BMA could offer more support to whistleblowers. BMA leader Dr Mark Porter does not appear to have asked Hunt for such a public inquiry. The BMA claims Jesudason ‘did not follow advice provided by the legal team instructed to represent him, and shared confidential information externally’. Coincidentally, this information is profoundly embarrassing to the BMA, as well as exposing serious concerns about patient safety and bullying at Alder Hey hospital. Jeusadson, who has just £9000 left to his name, would rather give the money to Medicine Sans Frontiers to fight Ebola than the BMA. The super-rich BMA has put £250,000 aside to pursue £241,000 Jesudason simply doesn’t have. The Health Select Committee and Robert Francis are to be congratulated for so publically acknowledging the pain and detriment whistleblowers suffer. But without the unions and lawyers on their side, they will never win. In MD’s view, it is still not safe to blow the whistle in the NHS. And patients are suffering as a result.